Branch Bank and Trust Company v. Cathy Lanier

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to reconsider [999555302-2]; denying Motion to supplement record [999543215-2]; denying Motion for leave to file CD exhibit [999543215-3]; denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal [999543209-2] .Originating case number: 3:13-cv-01318-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999603643]. Mailed to: Cathy and Randy Lanier. [15-1051]

Appeal: 15-1051

Doc: 21

Filed: 06/17/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1051

BRANCH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CATHY G. LANIER; RANDY D. LANIER,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-01318-JFA)

Submitted:

June 4, 2015

Decided:

June 17, 2015

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cathy G. Lanier; Randy D. Lanier, Appellants Pro Se.
Barry Licata, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Steven

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1051

Doc: 21

Filed: 06/17/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Appellants Cathy G. Lanier and Randy D. Lanier appeal the
district court’s order denying reconsideration of the court’s
earlier order denying reconsideration of the court’s judgment.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See Branch Bank & Trust Co. v. Lanier, No. 3:13-cv-

01318-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2014).
motions.
legal
before

We deny Appellants’ pending

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2