Anthony White v. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00684-F. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999640570]. Mailed to: Anthony White. [15-1062]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1062 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/14/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1062 ANTHONY E. WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00684-F) Submitted: May 28, 2015 Decided: August 14, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony E. White, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Forte Meddin, John Thomas Murray, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1062 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/14/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Anthony E. White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his racial discrimination and retaliation claims filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). * find no reasons reversible stated by error. the We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, district court. we affirm White v. for the Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00684-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2014). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * On appeal, White does not contest the district court’s disposition of his racial harassment and failure to hire or promote claims. He has therefore forfeited appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009) (limiting appellate review to arguments raised in the brief). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?