Anthony White v. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00684-F. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999640570]. Mailed to: Anthony White. [15-1062]
Appeal: 15-1062
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/14/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1062
ANTHONY E. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00684-F)
Submitted:
May 28, 2015
Decided:
August 14, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony E. White, Appellant Pro Se.
Christina Forte Meddin,
John Thomas Murray, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1062
Doc: 11
Filed: 08/14/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony E. White appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his racial discrimination and retaliation claims filed
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). *
find
no
reasons
reversible
stated
by
error.
the
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
district
court.
we
affirm
White
v.
for
the
Caterpillar
Logistics, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00684-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2014).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
On appeal, White does not contest the district court’s
disposition of his racial harassment and failure to hire or
promote claims. He has therefore forfeited appellate review of
those claims.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area
Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009) (limiting
appellate review to arguments raised in the brief).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?