Vanessa Spence v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999512779-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-01895-WGC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999568351]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-1071]

Appeal: 15-1071

Doc: 20

Filed: 04/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1071

VANESSA SPENCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, d/b/a Wal-Mart,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
William Connelly, Magistrate Judge.
(8:13-cv-01895-WGC)

Submitted:

April 16, 2015

Decided:

April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vanessa Spence, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Andrew Kohl, DECARO,
DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1071

Doc: 20

Filed: 04/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Vanessa Spence appeals the district court’s order granting
summary

judgment

in

favor

closing her civil action. *

of

Wal-Mart

Stores

LP

and

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

East,

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Spence’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district
court’s judgment.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the
parties’ consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

2