David Stebbins v. EduCap, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00961-CMH-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999573139].. [15-1074]

Appeal: 15-1074

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1074

DAVID A. STEBBINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDUCAP, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MORGAN DOUGHTY; NICHOLAS HOOD; RICHARD HOOD; HOOD & STACY,
P.A.,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00961-CMH-TCB)

Submitted:

April 23, 2015

Decided:

April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Stebbins, Appellant Pro Se.
Diana Margeaux Thomas,
WILLIAMS MULLEN, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1074

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David

A.

Stebbins

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting EduCap, Inc.’s summary judgment motion on his claims
under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12203
(2012), and for malicious prosecution under Arkansas law.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

before

this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

(E.D.

Stebbins v.

Inc.,

contentions

1:14-cv-00961-CMH-TCB

error.

EduCap,

legal

No.

We

presented

would

not

in
aid

Va.

the
the

Dec.

23,

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2