Ewart Vandecruize v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A072-163-909 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999616560].. [15-1085]

Appeal: 15-1085

Doc: 29

Filed: 07/08/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1085

EWART ULRIC VANDECRUIZE, a/k/a Ewart Vandercruize,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

June 30, 2015

Decided:

July 8, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis C. Diaz, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Derek C. Julius, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Benjamin Mark Moss, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1085

Doc: 29

Filed: 07/08/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ewart Ulric Vandecruize, a native and citizen of Guyana,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals

(“Board”)

denying

his

motion

to

reopen.

We

have

reviewed the administrative record and Vandecruize’s claims and
find no abuse of discretion.

See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314,

323-24 (1992) (setting forth standard of review).

Accordingly,

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board.
dispense

See In re: Vandecruize (B.I.A. Dec. 22, 2014).
with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2