Greenwich Insurance Company v. Medical Mutual Insurance Co
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for leave to file [999735422-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00295-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999887598]. [15-1107]
Appeal: 15-1107
Doc: 35
Filed: 07/14/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1107
GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MEDICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00295-D)
Submitted:
May 31, 2016
Decided:
July 14, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
R.
Steven
DeGeorge,
ROBINSON,
BRADSHAW
&
HINSON,
P.A.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Daniel J. Standish,
Gary P. Seligman, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1107
Doc: 35
Filed: 07/14/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Medical Mutual Insurance Company (“MMI”) appeals from the
district court’s order granting summary judgment for Greenwich
Insurance Company on Greenwich’s complaint seeking a declaratory
judgment that it had no duty to defend MMI in an underlying suit
against MMI pursuant to an insurance policy Greenwich issued to
MMI.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny MMI’s
motion
to
attach
court
documents
filed
unrelated case to its opening brief.
by
Greenwich
in
an
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?