Jean Kaufman v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00237. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999589668]. Mailed to: J. Kaufman. [15-1122]
Appeal: 15-1122
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1122
JEAN ELIZABETH KAUFMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00237)
Submitted:
May 21, 2015
Decided:
May 26, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jean Elizabeth Kaufman, Appellant Pro Se. John Fulton Gianola,
Stephen
Michael
Horn,
Assistant
United
States
Attorneys,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1122
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jean Elizabeth Kaufman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing,
after
a
bench
trial,
her
civil
action
brought
pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b),
2671–2680
(West
2006
&
Supp.
2014).
The
district
court
dismissed Kaufman’s complaint because it found that the United
States had not waived its sovereign immunity to suit for the
claims
raised
by
Kaufman
and,
thus,
that
matter jurisdiction over Kaufman’s claims.
record and discern no reversible error.
it
dispense
No.
1:12-cv-00237
with
contentions
are
oral
(S.D.W.
argument
adequately
Va.
because
presented
in
subject
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
States,
lacked
Jan.
the
the
Kaufman v. United
7,
2015).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?