Sydney Hart v. Jacob Lew
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03482-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999643171].. [15-1136]
Appeal: 15-1136
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1136
SYDNEY S. HART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACOB J. LEW, U.S. Department of the Treasury,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03482-ELH)
Submitted:
June 19, 2015
Decided:
August 19, 2015
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sydney S. Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1136
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sydney S. Hart appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, on
Hart’s claims of sex discrimination and retaliation in violation
of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e–17 (2012), amended by Pub. L. No. 113-235, 128 Stat.
2130, 2537, 2537 (2014).
This Court reviews de novo whether a
district court erred in granting summary judgment.
Dulaney v.
Packaging Corp. of Am., 673 F.3d 323, 330 (4th Cir. 2012).
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Hart v. Lew, No. 1:12-cv-03482-ELH (D. Md. filed Feb. 6,
2015 & entered Feb. 9, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?