Sydney Hart v. Jacob Lew

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-03482-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999643171].. [15-1136]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1136 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1136 SYDNEY S. HART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JACOB J. LEW, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant – Appellee, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03482-ELH) Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: August 19, 2015 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sydney S. Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1136 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sydney S. Hart appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, on Hart’s claims of sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012), amended by Pub. L. No. 113-235, 128 Stat. 2130, 2537, 2537 (2014). This Court reviews de novo whether a district court erred in granting summary judgment. Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of Am., 673 F.3d 323, 330 (4th Cir. 2012). have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hart v. Lew, No. 1:12-cv-03482-ELH (D. Md. filed Feb. 6, 2015 & entered Feb. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?