Jose Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-109-123,A205-109-124,A205-109-125 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999670227].. [15-1140]
Appeal: 15-1140
Doc: 37
Filed: 10/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1140
JOSE ARMANDO
J.A.S.A.,
SANCHEZ;
AMANDA
MARIBEL
ANDINO
SEVILLA;
Petitioners,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
September 16, 2015
Decided:
October 1, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas K. Ragland, BENACH RAGLAND LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioners.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney General, John W. Blakeley, Assistant Director, Margaret
Kuehne Taylor, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1140
Doc: 37
Filed: 10/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jose
Armando
Sanchez,
his
wife,
Amanda
Maribel
Andino
Sevilla, and their minor son, J.A.S.A., * natives and citizens of
Honduras,
petition
for
review
Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
immigration
judge’s
denial
withholding
of
Against
removal,
Torture.
We
of
an
order
dismissing
of
and
have
of
their
Sanchez’s
the
Board
of
from
the
appeal
requests
protection
under
thoroughly
reviewed
for
the
asylum,
Convention
the
record,
including the transcript of Sanchez’s merits hearing and all
supporting evidence.
not
compel
a
We conclude that the record evidence does
ruling
contrary
to
any
of
the
administrative
factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.
See INS v.
Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly,
we
deny
the
petition
reasons stated by the Board.
2015).
legal
before
for
review
for
the
In re Sanchez (B.I.A. Jan. 14,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
*
Sanchez is the primary applicant for asylum and the claims
of his wife and son are derivative of his application.
See 8
U.S.C. § 1158(b)(3) (2012); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.21(a) (2015).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?