Darlene Davis v. Comcast Corporation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999583652-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999634625]. Mailed to: Davis. [15-1143]
Appeal: 15-1143
Doc: 23
Filed: 08/05/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1143
DARLENE J. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE MINOR; DAN SIMSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DANA THOMAS; RICO WADE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD)
Submitted:
May 21, 2015
Decided:
August 5, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darlene J. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy McCormack, Michelle
Marie
McGeogh,
BALLARD
SPAHR,
LLP,
Baltimore,
Maryland,
Constantinos
George
Panagopoulos,
BALLARD
SPAHR,
LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Appeal: 15-1143
Doc: 23
Filed: 08/05/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-1143
Doc: 23
Filed: 08/05/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Darlene J. Davis appeals various pretrial orders and the
district court’s final order denying relief on her complaint
filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Equal Pay Act, 29
U.S.C. § 206(d) (2012).
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Davis v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:13-cv-
01513-GBL-IDD
Jan.
(E.D.
Va.
26,
2015).
Davis
has
filed
a
motion for a hearing in this Court, stating that she did not
receive one of Comcast’s attachments to its response.
Because
Comcast has now filed the requested attachment, we deny Davis’
motion.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
Court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?