Helen Dale v. MD Dept. of Transportation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00191-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000001789].. [15-1158]
Appeal: 15-1158
Doc: 46
Filed: 01/11/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1158
HELEN DALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION,
OF
TRANSPORTATION,
MARYLAND
TRANSIT
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00191-ELH)
Submitted:
November 30, 2016
Decided:
January 11, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian
E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric
S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1158
Doc: 46
Filed: 01/11/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Helen Dale appeals the district court’s order granting the
Maryland
Department
Transportation
of
Transportation’s
Administration’s
motion
to
and
the
dismiss
Maryland
Dale’s
race
and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII
of
the
Civil
§§ 2000e
to
discrimination
Discrimination
Rights
Act
2000e-17
1964,
(West
claims,
in
of
as
2008
brought
Employment
amended,
&
Supp.
pursuant
Act
of
42
2016);
to
1967,
U.S.C.A.
the
as
age
Age
amended,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and unlawful
employment practices claims, brought pursuant to the Maryland
Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20606(a)(1)(i) (West 2014).
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
See Dale v. Md. Dep’t of Transp.,
No. 1:13-cv-00191-ELH (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2015).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?