Ernest Hendry, Jr. v. The Georgelas Group, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01455-JCC-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999587576]. Mailed to: E. Hendry, J. Hendry. [15-1161]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1161 Doc: 24 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1161 ERNEST S. HENDRY, JR.; JUDITH V. HENDRY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. THE GEORGELAS GROUP, INC., a Corporation Chartered in the Commonwealth of Virginia in Business Under the Common Name and Style of Said Company; FRANCIS J. PELLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01455-JCC-TCB) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry, Appellants Pro Se. Peter F. Axelrad, COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis, Maryland; Robert Mccay Hardy, Carol Thomas Stone, JORDAN COYNE LLP, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1161 Doc: 24 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action on statute of limitations grounds. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hendry v. The Georgelas Group, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01455- JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?