Donald Sullivan v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999531642-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00287-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Lee Perla; Donald Sullivan P. O. Box 441 Atkinson, NC 28421. [15-1167]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent,
DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan,
Defendant – Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL)
June 25, 2015
June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory
Attorney, Robert Joel Branman, Lee Perla, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the United States in an interpleader
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
Pendergrass v. Sullivan, No. 5:14-cv-00287-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?