Donald Sullivan v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999531642-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00287-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999610697]. Mailed to: Lee Perla; Donald Sullivan P. O. Box 441 Atkinson, NC 28421. [15-1167]

Appeal: 15-1167

Doc: 19

Filed: 06/29/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1167

JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan,
Defendant – Appellant,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL)

Submitted:

June 25, 2015

Decided:

June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory
Attorney, Robert Joel Branman, Lee Perla, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1167

Doc: 19

Filed: 06/29/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the United States in an interpleader
action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the

appeal

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Pendergrass v. Sullivan, No. 5:14-cv-00287-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20,
2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2