Donald Sullivan v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999531642-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00287-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999610697]. Mailed to: Lee Perla; Donald Sullivan P. O. Box 441 Atkinson, NC 28421. [15-1167]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1167 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1167 JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent, Plaintiff, v. DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan, Defendant – Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Robert Joel Branman, Lee Perla, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1167 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in an interpleader action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pendergrass v. Sullivan, No. 5:14-cv-00287-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?