Janice Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to vacate [999612970-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639682]. Mailed to: Janice Grenadier. [15-1169]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1169 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/13/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1169 JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LASALLE BANK, as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants – Appellees, and BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB) Submitted: July 30, 2015 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. NIEMEYER, Decided: Circuit Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. August 13, 2015 and HAMILTON, Appeal: 15-1169 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/13/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-1169 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/13/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint have and denying reviewed the her and find for reconsideration We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. record motion Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 19, 2015). deny Grenadier’s motion no to vacate. We dispense with We oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?