Janice Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to vacate [999612970-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999639682]. Mailed to: Janice Grenadier. [15-1169]
Appeal: 15-1169
Doc: 24
Filed: 08/13/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1169
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC;
HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. GALBRAITH;
WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LASALLE BANK, as
successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their
Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,
LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal
Capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB)
Submitted:
July 30, 2015
Before WILKINSON and
Senior Circuit Judge.
NIEMEYER,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
August 13, 2015
and
HAMILTON,
Appeal: 15-1169
Doc: 24
Filed: 08/13/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael,
BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary
Catherine
Zinsner,
TROUTMAN
SANDERS,
LLP,
Tysons
Corner,
Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons
Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-1169
Doc: 24
Filed: 08/13/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing
her
complaint
have
and
denying
reviewed
the
her
and
find
for
reconsideration
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
record
motion
Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No.
1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 19, 2015).
deny
Grenadier’s
motion
no
to
vacate.
We
dispense
with
We
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?