Wanda Scott v. SSA
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying motion pending under FRAP 4(a) [999537147-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999623588-2], denying Motion for other relief [999623594-2], denying Motion for other relief [999623598-2], denying Motion for other relief [999606720-2], denying Motion for other relief [999660398-2] Originating case number: 6:13-cv-00943-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Wanda Scott. [15-1183]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
September 17, 2015
November 5, 2015
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wanda Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her
civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Scott v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:13-cv-00943-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 5,
We deny all of Scott’s pending motions, including her
motions for a court order, to unmoot, for change of venue, for
recusal, and for public PACER.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?