Lawrence Little v. Donal Este
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01514-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999606529]. Mailed to: Ball, Little. [15-1206]
Appeal: 15-1206
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1206
LAWRENCE LITTLE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DONAL ESTES;
BOOTH,
HERBERT
SEGAR; BRANDON CHAMBERS; CEDRICOT
Defendants – Appellees,
and
EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE STATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-WDQ)
Submitted:
June 18, 2015
Decided:
June 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Little, Appellant Pro Se. Chaz Romeo Ball, Michael
Lawrence Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland; Kara Kiminsky Lynch, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1206
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence
Little
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his civil complaint as barred by res judicata.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Little v. Estes, No. 1:13-cv-01514-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 24,
2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?