Lawrence Little v. Donal Este

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01514-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999606529]. Mailed to: Ball, Little. [15-1206]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1206 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1206 LAWRENCE LITTLE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DONAL ESTES; BOOTH, HERBERT SEGAR; BRANDON CHAMBERS; CEDRICOT Defendants – Appellees, and EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE STATION, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-WDQ) Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Little, Appellant Pro Se. Chaz Romeo Ball, Michael Lawrence Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Kara Kiminsky Lynch, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1206 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Little appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as barred by res judicata. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Estes, No. 1:13-cv-01514-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?