Joseph Gilreath v. Cumberland County Board of Ed.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999549480-2]. Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00627-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court. . [15-1210]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
THOMAS HATCH; MICHAEL BAIN,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cv-00627-BR)
November 30, 2015
January 5, 2016
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Gilreath, Appellant Pro Se.
Daniel William Clark, Adam
S. Mitchell, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
raising a failure to accommodate claim and a retaliation claim.
He appeals the district court’s order granting CCBE’s motion for
a directed verdict on his failure to accommodate claim, the jury
district court’s order denying his various posttrial motions.
transcripts of the trial and the district court’s orders, and
reasons stated by the district court.
Gilreath v. Cumberland
Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 5:11-cv-00627-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2014;
Nov. 7, 2014; Jan. 27, 2015).
We further deny Gilreath’s motion
for the appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?