Sheryl Starliper v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [999619336-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03646-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999676292].. [15-1216]

Appeal: 15-1216

Doc: 39

Filed: 10/13/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1216

SHERYL STARLIPER, for Eric Glen Starliper, Deceased,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Administration,

Acting

Commissioner,

Social

Security

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:13-cv-03646-CCB)

Submitted:

September 30, 2015

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

FLOYD,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

and

October 13, 2015

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christine P. Benagh, COLLIER-BENAGH LAW, P.L.L.C., Washington,
D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney,
Jay C. Hinsley, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1216

Doc: 39

Filed: 10/13/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sheryl
accepting
the

Starliper

the

appeals

magistrate

Commissioner’s

the

judge’s

denial

of

disability insurance benefits. *

district

court’s

recommendation

her

husband’s

and

order

upholding

application

for

Our review of the Commissioner’s

determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are
supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law
was applied.
2015).

See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.

We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the

administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no
reversible

error.

Accordingly,

while

we

grant

Starliper’s

motion to file a supplemental appendix, we affirm the district
court’s judgment.

Starliper v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-03646-CCB

(D. Md. Jan. 28, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

Sheryl Starliper was substituted as the party in interest
after the claimant’s death.

2