In re: Ryan Ramey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999545591-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999539266-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cr-00162-RWT-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999640607]. Mailed to: Ryan Ramey. [15-1221]
Appeal: 15-1221
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/14/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1221
In Re:
RYAN RANDALL RAMEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(8:09-cr-00162-RWT-1)
Submitted:
August 7, 2015
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
AGEE,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
August 14, 2015
HAMILTON,
Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan Randall Ramey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1221
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/14/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ryan
Randall
Ramey
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion
for
reconsideration
proceeding.
district
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2255
(2012)
He seeks an order from this court directing the
court
docket reveals
July 8,
in
2015.
to
act.
that
the
Our
review
district
Accordingly,
of
court
because
the
district
denied
the
the
district
court’s
motion
court
on
has
recently decided Ramey’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?