Adrienne Walker-Pittman v. MD Dept of Transportation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00202-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999991802].. [15-1226]
Appeal: 15-1226
Doc: 38
Filed: 12/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1226
ADRIENNE WALKER-PITTMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION,
OF
TRANSPORTATION;
MARYLAND
TRANSIT
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00202-CCB)
Submitted:
November 30, 2016
Decided:
December 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian
E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric
S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1226
Doc: 38
Filed: 12/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Adrienne Walker-Pittman appeals the district court’s order
granting
Maryland
the
Maryland
Department
Transportation
of
Transportation’s
Administration’s
motion
and
to
the
dismiss
Walker-Pittman’s retaliation and race and gender discrimination
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 &
Supp. 2016); retaliation and age discrimination claims, brought
pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
retaliation
and
pursuant
the
to
disability
Americans
discrimination
with
claims,
Disabilities
Act,
brought
42
U.S.C.
§§ 12101-12213 (2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
and unlawful employment practices claims, brought pursuant to
the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State
Gov’t
§ 20-606(a)(1)(i)
(West
2014).
record and find no reversible error.
district
court’s
Transp.,
No.
dispense
with
order.
See
argument
have
(D.
Md.
because
2
reviewed
the
Accordingly, we affirm the
Walker-Pittman
1:14-cv-00202-CCB
oral
We
Jan.
the
v.
Md.
Dep’t
29,
2015).
facts
and
of
We
legal
Appeal: 15-1226
Doc: 38
contentions
are
Filed: 12/21/2016
adequately
Pg: 3 of 3
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?