Adrienne Walker-Pittman v. MD Dept of Transportation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00202-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999991802].. [15-1226]

Appeal: 15-1226

Doc: 38

Filed: 12/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1226

ADRIENNE WALKER-PITTMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION,

OF

TRANSPORTATION;

MARYLAND

TRANSIT

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:14-cv-00202-CCB)

Submitted:

November 30, 2016

Decided:

December 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian
E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric
S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1226

Doc: 38

Filed: 12/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Adrienne Walker-Pittman appeals the district court’s order
granting
Maryland

the

Maryland

Department

Transportation

of

Transportation’s

Administration’s

motion

and

to

the

dismiss

Walker-Pittman’s retaliation and race and gender discrimination
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 &
Supp. 2016); retaliation and age discrimination claims, brought
pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
retaliation

and

pursuant

the

to

disability
Americans

discrimination
with

claims,

Disabilities

Act,

brought

42

U.S.C.

§§ 12101-12213 (2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
and unlawful employment practices claims, brought pursuant to
the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State
Gov’t

§ 20-606(a)(1)(i)

(West

2014).

record and find no reversible error.
district

court’s

Transp.,

No.

dispense

with

order.

See

argument

have

(D.

Md.

because

2

reviewed

the

Accordingly, we affirm the

Walker-Pittman

1:14-cv-00202-CCB
oral

We

Jan.
the

v.

Md.

Dep’t

29,

2015).

facts

and

of
We

legal

Appeal: 15-1226

Doc: 38

contentions

are

Filed: 12/21/2016

adequately

Pg: 3 of 3

presented

in

the

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3