Adrienne Walker-Pittman v. MD Dept of Transportation
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00202-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [15-1226]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
November 30, 2016
December 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian
E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric
S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Adrienne Walker-Pittman appeals the district court’s order
Walker-Pittman’s retaliation and race and gender discrimination
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 &
Supp. 2016); retaliation and age discrimination claims, brought
pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
§§ 12101-12213 (2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016);
and unlawful employment practices claims, brought pursuant to
the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State
record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the
Pg: 3 of 3
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?