Adrienne Walker-Pittman v. MD Dept of Transportation


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00202-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999991802].. [15-1226]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1226 Doc: 38 Filed: 12/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1226 ADRIENNE WALKER-PITTMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION, OF TRANSPORTATION; MARYLAND TRANSIT Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00202-CCB) Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: December 21, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Jennifer L. Katz, Eric S. Hartwig, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1226 Doc: 38 Filed: 12/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Adrienne Walker-Pittman appeals the district court’s order granting Maryland the Maryland Department Transportation of Transportation’s Administration’s motion and to the dismiss Walker-Pittman’s retaliation and race and gender discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); retaliation and age discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); retaliation and pursuant the to disability Americans discrimination with claims, Disabilities Act, brought 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2012), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and unlawful employment practices claims, brought pursuant to the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20-606(a)(1)(i) (West 2014). record and find no reversible error. district court’s Transp., No. dispense with order. See argument have (D. Md. because 2 reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm the Walker-Pittman 1:14-cv-00202-CCB oral We Jan. the v. Md. Dep’t 29, 2015). facts and of We legal Appeal: 15-1226 Doc: 38 contentions are Filed: 12/21/2016 adequately Pg: 3 of 3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?