Mark Brooks v. Dadma Diaz C

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999542055-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626004]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-1241]

Appeal: 15-1241

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1241

MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON,
DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)

Submitted:

July 21, 2015

Decided:

July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1241

Doc: 11

Filed: 07/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark
accepting

Douglas
the

Brooks

appeals

recommendation

of

the
the

district

court’s

magistrate

order

judge

and

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brooks

v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2