Mark Brooks v. Dadma Diaz C
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999542055-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626004]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-1241]
Appeal: 15-1241
Doc: 11
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1241
MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON,
DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)
Submitted:
July 21, 2015
Decided:
July 23, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1241
Doc: 11
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mark
accepting
Douglas
the
Brooks
appeals
recommendation
of
the
the
district
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Brooks
v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?