Kimberly Spence v. Carl Willis, II

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999548271-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00057-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999589534]. [15-1242]

Appeal: 15-1242

Doc: 15

Filed: 05/26/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1242

KIMBERLY T. SPENCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARL J. WILLIS, II,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00057-BO)

Submitted:

May 21, 2015

Decided:

May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kimberly T. Spence, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1242

Doc: 15

Filed: 05/26/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kimberly

T.

Spence

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing her petition to remove her state child-custody case
to federal court as improperly filed, construing her petition as
a

complaint,

and

Feldman * doctrine.

dismissing

the

complaint

under

the

Rooker-

On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Spence’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Spence has forfeited appellate
review

of

district
transcript

the

court’s

court’s
at

order.

judgment

government

Accordingly,

and

deny

expense.

Spence’s
We

we

affirm

motion

dispense

the

for

with

a

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983);
Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923)

2