Catherine Randolph v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00552-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999587806]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-1258]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1258 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1258 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney (MD), U.S. Attorney; ROD ROSENSTEIN, U.S. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00552-JFM) Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1258 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph Mar. 9, 2015). v. Holder, No. 1:15-cv-00552-JFM (D. Md. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?