Catherine Randolph v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00552-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999587806]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-1258]
Appeal: 15-1258
Doc: 7
Filed: 05/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1258
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Attorney (MD),
U.S.
Attorney;
ROD
ROSENSTEIN,
U.S.
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00552-JFM)
Submitted:
May 19, 2015
Decided: May 21, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1258
Doc: 7
Filed: 05/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine
Denise
Randolph
appeals
the
district
court’s
order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to
state a claim.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Randolph
Mar. 9, 2015).
v.
Holder,
No.
1:15-cv-00552-JFM
(D.
Md.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?