Eric Clay v. Carolyn Colvin
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01119-LCB-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Eric Clay. [15-1285]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ERIC L. CLAY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant – Appellee,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
Loretta C. Biggs,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01119-LCB-JEP)
July 30, 2015
August 6, 2015
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric L. Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa G. Smoller, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Eric L. Clay appeals the district court’s order adopting
court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised Clay that failure to file
timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Clay has waived appellate
review by failing to file specific objections after receiving
Pg: 3 of 3
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?