Chun Rao v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-278-965. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999642180]. Mailed to: Chun Rao. [15-1292]
Appeal: 15-1292
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/18/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1292
CHUN RAO, a/k/a Rao Chun,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
August 12, 2015
Decided:
August 18, 2015
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chun Rao, Petitioner Pro Se.
Charles S. Greene, III, Erik
Robert Quick, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1292
Doc: 12
Filed: 08/18/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chun Rao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of
China,
petitions
Board
of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen.
On
appeal,
we
confine
informal brief.
his
for
informal
review
our
of
review
an
to
order
the
issues
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
brief
to
challenge
of
several
the
raised
in
the
Because Rao fails in
key
findings
in
the
Board’s order that are ultimately dispositive of his claims, we
conclude
that
Rao
has
forfeited
appellate
findings and deny the petition for review.
(BIA Feb. 20, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
review
of
these
See In re Chun Rao
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?