Chun Rao v. Eric Holder, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-278-965. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999642180]. Mailed to: Chun Rao. [15-1292]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1292 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1292 CHUN RAO, a/k/a Rao Chun, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 12, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015 Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chun Rao, Petitioner Pro Se. Charles S. Greene, III, Erik Robert Quick, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1292 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chun Rao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. On appeal, we confine informal brief. his for informal review our of review an to order the issues See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). brief to challenge of several the raised in the Because Rao fails in key findings in the Board’s order that are ultimately dispositive of his claims, we conclude that Rao has forfeited appellate findings and deny the petition for review. (BIA Feb. 20, 2015). facts and materials legal before review of these See In re Chun Rao We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?