Carolyn Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00970-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999587555]. Mailed to: Reed-Smith. [15-1300]

Appeal: 15-1300

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1300

CAROLYN E. REED-SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SPARTANBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEVEN,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00970-JMC)

Submitted:

May 19, 2015

Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn E. Reed-Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Carlos C. Johnson,
Kenneth William Nettles, Jr., LYLES DARR & CLARK, LLP,
Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1300

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Carolyn E. Reed-Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.
our

review

to

the

issues

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

raised

in

On appeal, we confine

the

Appellant’s

brief.

Because Reed-Smith’s informal brief does

not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Reed-Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly,

we

We dispense

with

contentions

are

affirm
oral

the

district

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

court’s

judgment.

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2