Wimer & Associates, PC v. Eva Thiel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00168-MR,1:13-bk-10808,1:14-ap-01016 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999729841].. [15-1310]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1310 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1310 In Re: EVA CHRISTINE THIEL, Debtor. ----------------------------------WIMER & ASSOCIATES, PC, d/b/a Asheville Law Group, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. EVA CHRISTINE THIEL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00168-MR) Submitted: December 22, 2015 Decided: January 5, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. D. Rodney Kight, Jr., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kevin J. Radey, LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN J. RADEY, PLLC, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1310 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Wimer & Associates, P.C., appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing its adversary proceeding filed in Eva Christine Thiel’s bankruptcy case seeking a determination that Thiel’s debt to it for prepetition legal fees was not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the parties’ arguments and the record submitted on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wimer & Assocs., P.C. v. Thiel, No. 1:14-cv-00168-MR (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?