Wimer & Associates, PC v. Eva Thiel
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00168-MR,1:13-bk-10808,1:14-ap-01016 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999729841].. [15-1310]
Appeal: 15-1310
Doc: 24
Filed: 01/05/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1310
In Re: EVA CHRISTINE THIEL,
Debtor.
----------------------------------WIMER & ASSOCIATES, PC, d/b/a Asheville Law Group,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
EVA CHRISTINE THIEL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00168-MR)
Submitted:
December 22, 2015
Decided:
January 5, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
D. Rodney Kight, Jr., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Kevin J. Radey, LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN J. RADEY, PLLC, Asheville,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1310
Doc: 24
Filed: 01/05/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Wimer & Associates, P.C., appeals from the district court’s
order
affirming
the
bankruptcy
court’s
order
dismissing
its
adversary proceeding filed in Eva Christine Thiel’s bankruptcy
case seeking a determination that Thiel’s debt to it for prepetition legal fees was not dischargeable in her bankruptcy case.
We have reviewed the parties’ arguments and the record submitted
on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Wimer & Assocs.,
P.C. v. Thiel, No. 1:14-cv-00168-MR (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2015).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?