Byron Briggs v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00844-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999697589]. [15-1317]

Appeal: 15-1317

Doc: 26

Filed: 11/12/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1317

BYRON C. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RAYMOND P. LACEY,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00844-BR)

Submitted:

October 29, 2015

Decided:

November 12, 2015

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bikash Roy, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Thomas G.
Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, G.
Norman Acker, III, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Appeal: 15-1317

Doc: 26

Filed: 11/12/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1317

Doc: 26

Filed: 11/12/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Byron C. Briggs appeals the district court’s orders denying
his

motion

to

set

aside

the

Government’s

scope-of-employment

certification, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1), (d)(1) (2012), and
granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Briggs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00844-BR (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 6, 2015; Feb. 2, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3