McElroy Coal Company v. DOWCP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 13-0592 BLA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999716673].. [15-1322]
Appeal: 15-1322
Doc: 53
Filed: 12/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1322
MCELROY COAL COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ROGER D. KENNEDY,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(13-0592 BLA)
Submitted:
November 30, 2015
Decided:
December 11, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey R. Soukup, Kevin M. McGuire, Williams S. Mattingly,
JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Petitioner.
M.
Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate
Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Washington, D.C.; Anne Megan Davis, Thomas E. Johnson, JOHNSON,
JONES, SNELLING, GILBERT & DAVIS, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1322
Doc: 53
Filed: 12/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
McElroy Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s
decision
and
order
affirming
the
administrative
law
judge’s award of living miner benefits to former miner Roger D.
Kennedy,
pursuant
to
30
U.S.C.
§§ 901-945
subsequent order denying reconsideration.
record
discloses
that
the
ALJ’s
(2012)
and
its
Our review of the
decision
is
based
upon
substantial evidence and that the Board’s decision is without
reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
We
oral
dispense
contentions
with
are
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?