Kenda R. Kirby v. North Carolina State
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to allow a new issue on appeal [999624699-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00850-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999652677]. Mailed to: Kirby. [15-1333]
Appeal: 15-1333
Doc: 20
Filed: 09/02/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1333
KENDA R. KIRBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00850-FL)
Submitted:
August 17, 2015
Decided:
September 2, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenda R. Kirby, Appellant Pro Se.
Alexander McClure Peters,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1333
Doc: 20
Filed: 09/02/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Kenda R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her civil complaint.
The district court referred this
case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
(2012).
and
The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied
advised
Kirby
that
failure
to
file
objections
to
this
recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v.
Arn,
474
U.S.
140
(1985).
Liberally
construed,
Kirby’s
objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
specifically
challenged
address
claims
her
Amendments
of
recommendation
1972,
to
protection claims.
the
magistrate
concerning
20
deny
Title
U.S.C.
relief
judge’s
IX
of
§§ 1681-1688
on
her
due
failure
the
Education
(2012),
process
to
and
and
the
equal
By failing to file specific objections to
the magistrate judge’s recommendation with regard to her other
claims,
after
receiving
proper
appellate review of those claims.
2
notice,
Kirby
has
waived
Appeal: 15-1333
Doc: 20
Filed: 09/02/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
Turning to the district court’s dismissal of Kirby’s Title
IX, equal protection, and due process claims, we have reviewed
the record and discern no reversible error.
affirm the judgment of the district court.
Accordingly, we
Kirby v. N.C. State
Univ., No. 5:13-cv-00850-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2015).
We deny
Kirby’s motion to allow a new issue on appeal and dispense with
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?