Harald Schmidt v. Steven Hunsberger

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01372-LO-MSN,1:14-cv-01373-LO-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658230]. Mailed to: Harald Schmidt Apt. 204 11291 Chatterly Loop Manassas, VA 20109. [15-1340]

Appeal: 15-1340

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/11/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1340

HARALD SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVEN HUNSBERGER; JOHN BURK,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MICHAEL BURKE,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01372-LO-MSN; 1:14-cv-01373-LO-MSN)

Submitted:

August 31, 2015

Decided:

September 11, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se.
Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1340

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/11/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Harald

Schmidt

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

consolidating his cases against Officers Steven Hunsberger and
John Burk and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints
against the officers.

We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders.

J.

See

A/S

Ludwig

Mowinckles

Rederi

v.

Tidewater

Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir. 1977) (identifying
district

court’s

broad

discretion

in

consolidation

issues);

United States v. Buckner, 473 F.3d 551, 554-55 (4th Cir. 2007)
(discussing
dispense

apparent

with

contentions

are

oral

authority
argument

adequately

to

consent

because

presented

in

the
the

to
facts

search).

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2