Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney General

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00916-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999606564]. Mailed to: Catherine Randolph. [15-1358, 15-1411]

Appeal: 15-1358

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1358

MISS CATHERINE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1411

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00916-ELH; 1:15-cv-00982-ELH)

Submitted:

June 18, 2015

Decided:

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

June 22, 2015

Appeal: 15-1358

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1358

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/22/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
In

these

consolidated

appeals,

Catherine

Denise

Randolph

appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints
for failing to state a claim.
(2012).

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

We have reviewed the records and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous for the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Randolph

v.

Attorney

Gen., No. 1:15-cv-00916-ELH (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2015); Randolph v.
Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-00982-ELH (D. Md. filed Apr. 9, 2015; entered
Apr. 10, 2015).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3