Theresa Ferguson v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01641-TSE-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999683837].. [15-1369]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1369 Doc: 24 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1369 THERESA N. FERGUSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, CHARLES PHILIP ROSENBERG, Director, Drug Enforcement Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01641-TSE-JFA) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theresa N. Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1369 Doc: 24 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Theresa N. Ferguson appeals the district granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. confine our brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). brief does review not to the challenge issues the raised in court’s order On appeal, we the Appellant’s Because Ferguson’s informal district court’s holding that summary judgment was appropriate where Ferguson did not exhaust her administrative remedies in good faith, forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. we affirm the district court’s judgment. Ferguson has Accordingly, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?