Damien Barker v. Computer Science Corporation
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00857-LO-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999645560]. Mailed to: Appellant. [15-1371]
Appeal: 15-1371
Doc: 14
Filed: 08/24/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1371
DAMIEN BARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00857-LO-MSN)
Submitted:
August 20, 2015
Decided:
August 24, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Damien Barker, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Richard Ward, III,
KULLMAN LAW FIRM, New Orleans, Louisiana; Frank Daniel Wood,
Jr., KULLMAN FIRM, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1371
Doc: 14
Filed: 08/24/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Damien Barker appeals the district court’s order granting
Computer Science Corporation’s summary judgment motion on his
harassment
and
discriminatory
and
retaliatory
termination
claims, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We have
Accordingly,
Barker v. Computer
Science Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00857 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2015).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?