Janece Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999592875-2], [999572162-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999628075]. Mailed to: Janece P. Mickens. [15-1381]
Appeal: 15-1381
Doc: 20
Filed: 07/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1381
JANECE P. MICKENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; ZAMAN KHAN; THERESA POND; SUSAN
MAYER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB)
Submitted:
July 23, 2015
Decided:
July 27, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janece P. Mickens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Nicholas Petkovich,
Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1381
Doc: 20
Filed: 07/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Janece Mickens appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil
complaint for failure to prosecute.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we grant Mickens leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Mickens
v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB (E.D.
Va. Mar. 17, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?