Robert Gambuti v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00129-MR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999731463]. [15-1414]
Appeal: 15-1414
Doc: 28
Filed: 01/07/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1414
ROBERT S. GAMBUTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of SSA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00129-MR)
Submitted:
December 31, 2015
Decided:
January 7, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Wicklund, Paul B. Eaglin, OLINSKY LAW GROUP, Syracuse,
New York, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States
Attorney, Lisa G. Smoller, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1414
Doc: 28
Filed: 01/07/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
upholding
S.
the
Gambuti
appeals
Commissioner’s
the
denial
disability insurance benefits.
district
of
his
court’s
order
application
for
Our review of the Commissioner’s
determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are
supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law
was applied.
2015).
See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.
We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the
administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no
reversible error.
judgment.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
Gambuti
Feb. 18, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
v.
Colvin,
No.
5:13-cv-00129-MR
(W.D.N.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?