Robert Gambuti v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00129-MR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999731463]. [15-1414]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1414 Doc: 28 Filed: 01/07/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1414 ROBERT S. GAMBUTI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of SSA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00129-MR) Submitted: December 31, 2015 Decided: January 7, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Wicklund, Paul B. Eaglin, OLINSKY LAW GROUP, Syracuse, New York, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Lisa G. Smoller, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1414 Doc: 28 Filed: 01/07/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert upholding S. the Gambuti appeals Commissioner’s the denial disability insurance benefits. district of his court’s order application for Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. 2015). See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir. We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s Gambuti Feb. 18, 2015). facts and materials legal before v. Colvin, No. 5:13-cv-00129-MR (W.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?