Susan Hester-Carrillo v. Ann Korbel-Albright

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999585211-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-00012-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999610778]. Mailed to: Susan Hester-Carrillo P. O. Box 56122 Washington, DC 20040. [15-1426]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1426 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1426 SUSAN HESTER-CARRILLO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE ANN KORBEL-ALBRIGHT; ANNE HURWITZ, Senior Court Evaluator Visitation Supervision Program; LEWIS NORDAN, Therapist II; ISIAH LEGGETT, Montgomery County Executive; CHRIS KUNZ, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15cv-00012-PWG) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Susan Hester-Carrillo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1426 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Susan Hester-Carrillo appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for lack of jurisdiction. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hester-Carrillo v. Korbel-Albright, No. 8:15- cv-00012-PWG (D. Md. Mar. 24, 2015). We deny Hester-Carrillo’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?