Sullivan v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999573144-2] Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00175-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999628034]. Mailed to: James D. Sullivan P. O. Box 441 Atkinson, NC 28421. [15-1430]
Appeal: 15-1430
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1430
JAMES D. SULLIVAN,
Movant - Appellant,
--------------------UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
RICHARD VON BIBERSTEIN, JR.,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00175-BO)
Submitted:
July 23, 2015
Decided:
July 27, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1430
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
D.
Sullivan
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and granting
the Government’s petition to enforce an Internal Revenue Service
third party summons and denying Sullivan’s motions to quash the
summons and stay the proceedings.
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
United States v. Biberstein, No. 7:14-cv-
00175-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?