Wanda Scott v. State of South Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to recuse [999606723-2]. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-01944-MGL-KFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999648693]. Mailed to: Wanda Scott. [15-1451]

Appeal: 15-1451

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/27/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1451

WANDA RENAE SCOTT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-01944-MGL-KFM)

Submitted:

August 20, 2015

Decided:

August 27, 2015

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wanda Renae Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1451

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/27/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wanda
granting

Scott

her

seeks

leave

to

to

appeal

amend

her

the

district

complaint.

court’s
This

order

court

may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),

and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
seeks

to

appeal

is

neither

a

final

order

nor

The order Scott
an

appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We deny Scott’s motion to

recuse.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
DISMISSED

2