Dardrie Rozzelle v. UNC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999610713]. Mailed to: Dardrie Rozzelle. [15-1458]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1458 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1458 DARDRIE ROZZELLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE; BANITA ALISON WALSH; MARIA DELGADILLO; ALLISON STEDMAN, BROWN; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00050-MOC-DSC) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dardrie Rozzelle, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Lou Trippe, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1458 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/29/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dardrie Rozzelle seeks to appeal the magistrate report recommending dismissal of her civil complaint. judge’s This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Rozzelle seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?