Hazel Sanders v. Enos Contractor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02590-ELH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999650413]. Mailed to: Hazel Sanders, Letecia Rollins and Rick Grams. [15-1476]--[Edited 08/31/2015 by CH]

Appeal: 15-1476

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1476

HAZEL L. SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ENOS
CONTRACTORS;
ADVISORS, LLC,

TRACY

RICHARDS;

BERKSHIRE

PROPERTY

Defendants – Appellees,
BERKSHIRE PROPERTIES,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02590-ELH)

Submitted:

August 27, 2015

Decided:

August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hazel L. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Rollins, SAGAL, FILBERT, QUASNEY
Maryland, for Appellees.

Rick M. Grams, Letecia G.
& BETTEN, P.A., Towson,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1476

Doc: 15

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Hazel L. Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying her motion for appointment of counsel.

We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
Parties

are

accorded

30

days

after

the

entry

of

the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

“[T]he timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
January 7, 2015.
2015.

The notice of appeal was filed on April 27,

Because Sanders failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
dismiss the appeal.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2