Eyvonne Artis v. U.S. Foods Service
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999605859-3] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02870-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999751769]. Mailed to: Eyvonne Artis 905 Joh Avenue Baltimore, MD 21229. [15-1477]
Appeal: 15-1477
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/09/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1477
EYVONNE ARTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. FOODS SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02870-JKB)
Submitted:
November 30, 2015
Decided:
February 9, 2016
Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se.
Christine Mary Costantino,
Karla Grossenbacher, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1477
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/09/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eyvonne Artis appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to U.S. Foods Service on her claims under Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Artis v. U.S. Foods Serv., No. 1:13-cv-02870-
JKB (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2015).
We deny Artis’ motion to appoint
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?