Jupiter Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658275]. Mailed to: Jupiter Dennell Wilson Sr. 1600 Head of River Road Chesapeake, VA 23322. [15-1480]
Appeal: 15-1480
Doc: 16
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1480
JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT;
CHIEF EDMOND ELLIOT, in their individual and official
capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF DAN FERMIL, in their individual and
official capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF ALVIN ELLIS, in their
individual and official capacity; DIVISION CHIEF JEFFREY
RABEAU, in their individual and official capacity; BATTALION
CHIEF CARLTON ACKISS, in their individual and official
capacity; CAPTAIN MICHAEL TORTURA, in their individual and
official capacity; LIEUTENANT WILLIAM DISAROON, in their
individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT DUANE DAGGERS,
in their individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT JERRY
BOHN, in their individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM)
Submitted:
September 9, 2015
Decided:
September 11, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 15-1480
Doc: 16
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Melissa Anne
Hamann, Dana English Sanford, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY,
Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-1480
Doc: 16
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Jupiter
granting
Wilson,
Sr.,
Defendants’
appeals
motion
to
the
district
dismiss
his
court’s
action
order
alleging
violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2015), and the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621
to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015).
and find no reversible error.
the
dismissal
order
to
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, although we modify
reflect
individual
that
the
defendants
district
dismissal
of
the
capacities
is
without
modified.
Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:14-cv-00420-MSD-
prejudice,
we
in
affirm
their
court’s
the
official
dismissal
DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3 & entered Apr. 6, 2015).
as
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?