Jupiter Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999658275]. Mailed to: Jupiter Dennell Wilson Sr. 1600 Head of River Road Chesapeake, VA 23322. [15-1480]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1480 JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF EDMOND ELLIOT, in their individual and official capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF DAN FERMIL, in their individual and official capacity; DEPUTY CHIEF ALVIN ELLIS, in their individual and official capacity; DIVISION CHIEF JEFFREY RABEAU, in their individual and official capacity; BATTALION CHIEF CARLTON ACKISS, in their individual and official capacity; CAPTAIN MICHAEL TORTURA, in their individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT WILLIAM DISAROON, in their individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT DUANE DAGGERS, in their individual and official capacity; LIEUTENANT JERRY BOHN, in their individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00420-MSD-DEM) Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Anne Hamann, Dana English Sanford, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-1480 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jupiter granting Wilson, Sr., Defendants’ appeals motion to the district dismiss his court’s action order alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2015), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2015). and find no reversible error. the dismissal order to We have reviewed the record Accordingly, although we modify reflect individual that the defendants district dismissal of the capacities is without modified. Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:14-cv-00420-MSD- prejudice, we in affirm their court’s the official dismissal DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3 & entered Apr. 6, 2015). as We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?