Stephen Owusu v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A096-546-062. Copies to all parties and the agency. [999748945]. [15-1492]

Appeal: 15-1492

Doc: 26

Filed: 02/04/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1492

STEPHEN KISSI OWUSU,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

January 19, 2016

Decided:

February 4, 2016

Before KING, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tamara L. Jezic, YACUB LAW OFFICES, Woodbridge, Virginia, for
Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney General, Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, Brooke M.
Maurer,
Office
of
Immigration
Litigation,
UNITED
STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1492

Doc: 26

Filed: 02/04/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Stephen

Kissi

Owusu,

a

native

and

citizen

of

Ghana,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its decision
upholding the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion
for a continuance and entering an order of removal.

We have

reviewed the administrative record and Owusu’s claims, and find
them to be without merit.
discretion

in

the

denial

We accordingly find no abuse of
of

reconsideration,

see

Narine

v.

Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Owusu (B.I.A. Apr. 20, 2015).

See In re:

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2