Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney of Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01137-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999650456]. Mailed to: Catherine Randolph. [15-1497, 15-1786]

Appeal: 15-1497

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1497

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US ATTORNEY
DEFENDANTS,

OF

MARYLAND,

Rod

Rosenstein,

et

al;

UNKNOWN

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 15-1786

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney
defendants: Melvin Bright,

General

-

Respondents

et

al

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-01137-JFM; 1:15-cv-02005-JFM )

Submitted:

August 27, 2015

Decided:

August 31, 2015

Appeal: 15-1497

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1497

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
In

these

consolidated

appeals,

Catherine

Denise

Randolph

appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints
for failing to state a claim.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012).

We

and

have

reviewed

the

records

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by
the district court.

Randolph v. US Attorney of Md., No. 1:15-

cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015);
Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM (D. Md. July 10, 2015).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3