In Re: Vicente Mbenga
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999586237-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999579504-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00548-RDB-6,1:13-cv-01424-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999596729]. Mailed to: V. Mbenga. [15-1498]
Appeal: 15-1498
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/05/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1498
In Re:
VICENTE BILORA MBENGA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:09-cr-00548-RDB-6; 1:13-cv-01424-RDB)
Submitted:
June 2, 2015
Decided:
June 5, 2015
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicente Bilora Mbenga, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1498
Doc: 9
Filed: 06/05/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Vicente Bilora Mbenga petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act.
Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Mbenga’s
motion on May 22, 2015.
has
recently
decided
Accordingly, because the district court
Mbenga’s
case,
we
deny
the
mandamus
petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We
oral
dispense
contentions
with
are
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?