Christopher Chin-Young v. Gary Rowell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-03772-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999707927]. Mailed to: Christopher Chin-Young & Tarra DeShields Minnis. [15-1500]

Appeal: 15-1500

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/30/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1500

CHRISTOPHER CHIN-YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY L. ROWELL, Department of the Army; LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Attorney General; U.S. ATTORNEY, of the United States;
WILLIAM D. SPENCER; KATHLEEN D. COLE; DENISE S. PRICE;
NICOLE DECRESCENZO,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:13-cv-03772-RWT)

Submitted:

October 30, 2015

Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.

and

AGEE,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

November 30, 2015

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Chin-Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Tarra DeShields
Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1500

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/30/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Christopher Chin-Young appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing

his

civil

reconsideration. *
reversible error.

We

action
have

and

denying

reviewed

the

his

record

motions
and

find

for
no

Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Chin-Young v. Powell, No.

8:13-cv-03772-RWT (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2015; May 7, 2015; May 19,
2015).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

*

We construe Chin-Young’s informal brief as a timely notice
of
appeal
from
the
orders
denying
his
motions
for
reconsideration.
See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49
(1992); Hughes v. Halifax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 823 F.2d 832, 834-35
(4th Cir. 1987).

2