Christopher Ramsay v. Roberta Garcia-Guajardo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999591453-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999626308-2]. Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999645564]. Mailed to: Appellants. [15-1511]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1511 Doc: 23 Filed: 08/24/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1511 CHRISTOPHER RAMSAY, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERTA L. GARCIA-GUAJARDO; STEVEN GUAJARDO, Defendants - Appellants, and SANIBEL & LANCASTER INSURANCE, LLC; GARY J. HUNTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL) Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo; Steven Guajardo, Appellants Pro Se. James R. Theuer, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1511 Doc: 23 Filed: 08/24/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Roberta L. Garcia-Guajardo and Steven Guajardo appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), (4), and (d)(3) motions to set aside the judgment against them. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and to find proceed no in reversible forma error. pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramsey v. Garcia-Guajardo, No. 2:11-cv-00207-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. May 5, 2015). appeal. legal before We deny Appellants’ motion for a stay pending We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?