David Clenney v. V. Swartz
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999585369-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: David Clenney. [15-1535]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DAVID T. CLENNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
OFFICER V. R. SWARTZ,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
October 20, 2015
October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David T. Clenney, Appellant Pro Se.
Karen L. Gibbons, Jamie
Marie Greenzweig, David Isaac Klass, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
David T. Clenney appeals the district court’s order denying
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
Swartz, No. 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?