David Clenney v. V. Swartz

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999585369-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683814]. Mailed to: David Clenney. [15-1535]

Appeal: 15-1535

Doc: 15

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1535

DAVID T. CLENNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER V. R. SWARTZ,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David T. Clenney, Appellant Pro Se.
Karen L. Gibbons, Jamie
Marie Greenzweig, David Isaac Klass, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1535

Doc: 15

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David T. Clenney appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Clenney

Swartz, No. 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

v.
We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2