David Clenney v. V. Swartz


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999585369-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683814]. Mailed to: David Clenney. [15-1535]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1535 Doc: 15 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1535 DAVID T. CLENNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER V. R. SWARTZ, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David T. Clenney, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, Jamie Marie Greenzweig, David Isaac Klass, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1535 Doc: 15 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David T. Clenney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clenney Swartz, No. 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2015). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts v. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?