Charles Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999586065-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00132-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626163]. Mailed to: Charles Godlove. [15-1540]
Appeal: 15-1540
Doc: 15
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1540
CHARLES GODLOVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARTINSBURG SENIOR TOWERS, LP; MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT
LTD.; AMERICAN PRESERVATION BUILDERS LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00132-GMG-RWT)
Submitted:
July 21, 2015
Decided:
July 23, 2015
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Godlove, Appellant Pro Se. Jason S. Murphy, Susan Renee
Snowden, MARTIN & SEIBERT, LC, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Gregory
Ernest Kennedy, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK PC, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1540
Doc: 15
Filed: 07/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Godlove appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion for appointment of counsel and granting Appellees’
motion for summary judgment.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP, No. 3:14-cv-
00132-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30, 3015, Apr. 21, 2015).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?