Charles Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999586065-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00132-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626163]. Mailed to: Charles Godlove. [15-1540]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1540 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1540 CHARLES GODLOVE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTINSBURG SENIOR TOWERS, LP; MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT LTD.; AMERICAN PRESERVATION BUILDERS LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00132-GMG-RWT) Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Godlove, Appellant Pro Se. Jason S. Murphy, Susan Renee Snowden, MARTIN & SEIBERT, LC, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Gregory Ernest Kennedy, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK PC, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1540 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/23/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Godlove appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godlove v. Martinsburg Senior Towers, LP, No. 3:14-cv- 00132-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30, 3015, Apr. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?